From South China Sea to Gwadar Port: Conflict Management in Asia and Broader Global Implications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56830/IJHMPS12202407Keywords:
China, U.S, Governance, ASEAN, non-interference, South China Sea, Gwadar, CPEC, conflict managementAbstract
This article examines the potential challenges of China’s expansionist projects in Asia to the U.S global governance model and ASEAN institutional model of governance based on non-interference. It analyzes the geopolitical challenges posed by China’s expansionist initiatives, including the Gwadar Port, China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), and South China Sea projects, to the U.S. global governance model and ASEAN’s regional noninterference approach. These developments signify a potential game-changer for Asia and global politics. The study evaluates ASEAN's effectiveness in addressing the growing economic and political rivalry between the U.S. and China. While ASEAN promotes a model of governance rooted in sovereignty and consensus, its limitations in resolving critical disputes highlight the escalating influence of China's unilateral strategies. The article also underscores the broader implications of China's initiatives, such as reshaping trade networks and challenging traditional power dynamics. By examining these trends, the study suggests that China's actions not only affect regional stability but also signal a pivotal shift in global governance frameworks and geopolitical alignments.
References
Bellamy, A., & Beeson, M. (2010). The Responsibility to Protect in Southeast Asia: Can ASEAN Reconcile Humanitarianism and Sovereignty? Asian Security, pp. 262-279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14799855.2010.507414
Bhattacharjee, D. (2015). China Pakistan Economic Corridor. SSRN Electronic Journal. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2608927
Gregory, B. P. (2013). The South China Sea in Focus: Clarifying the Limits of Maritime Dispute. Center for Strategic and International Studies CSIS, pp. 1-29.
Guiyab, A. (2013). Human Rights in ASEAN: How non-interference Impedes Development . Working Article.
Hideshi, U. (2013). The Problems in the South-China Sea. Review of Island Studies,, pp.1-11.
Ikenberry, J. (2000). After the Cold War, After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, And the Rebuilding of Order After Major Wars, United Kingdom. Princeton University Press, pp. 215-256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691169217.003.0007
Jervis, R. (2009). Unipolarity: A Structural Perspective. World Politics, V. 61, N.1, pp. 188-213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887109000070
Keohane, R., & Nye, J. (1996). Complex Interdependence and the Role of Force, International Politics, Robert C. Art and Robert Jervis, eds. New York: Harper Collins, pp. 236-251.
Krasner, S. (1996). Power vs. Wealth in North South Economic Relations, International Politics, 4th edition, New York. Harper Collins, pp. 299318.
Lunn, J., & Lang, A. (2016). The South China Sea dispute, Policy Article. The House of Commons, pp.1-3.
Mastanduno, M. (2009). System Maker and Privilege Taker: U.S. Power and the International Political Economy. World Politics, V. 61, N. 1, pp. 121-154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.0.0030
Pakistan, G. o. (2017). Progress Update. Retrieved from China Pakistan Economic Corridor. http://cpec.gov.pk/progress-update.
Ramay, S. A. (2016). CPEC: A Chinese Dream Being Materialized Through Pakistan, Policy Brief. Sustainable Development Policy Institute SDPI, pp.1-28.
Rustandi, A. (2016). The South China Sea Dispute: Opportunities for ASEAN to enhance its policies in order to achieve resolution, Working Article. The Centre for Defense and Strategic Studies, pp. 1-26.
Wang, J. (2015). Chinas New Silk road: A case study in Eu–China relations. In: Amighini, A. & Berkofsky, A. ed, Xis Policy Gambles. The Bumpy Road Ahead, Beijing: ISPI, pp. 92–109.
Wang, V., & Lee, C. (2014). ASEAN and Recent Tensions in the South China Sea, In A Bridge Over Troubled Waters: Prospects for Peace in the South and East China Sea. Prospect Foundation Taiwan, pp.135-154.
Wohlforth, W. (2009). Unipolarity, Status Competition and Great Power War. World Politics, Vol. 61, N. 1, pp. 28-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.0.0028
