Civil Society and the Formation of Political Identity: Evidence from Egypt
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56830/IJHMPS06202502Keywords:
Civil society, political identity, democratization, CSOs, Egypt, Misr El Kheir FoundationAbstract
This study examines the role of civil society organizations (CSOs) in shaping political identity and affiliation, with a focus on Egypt. While existing literature has extensively explored CSOs' impact on democratization and development, limited attention has been given to their influence on political identity formation. Using the Misr El Kheir (MEK) Foundation as a case study, this research employs Organizational Identity Theory (OIT) and Migdal’s State-Society Model to analyze how CSOs influence their members and beneficiaries. A quantitative survey was conducted among MEK members and beneficiaries, with statistical analysis revealing that CSOs play a significant role in shaping political identity, particularly among beneficiaries. The findings highlight the complex interplay between civil society and the state, suggesting that states may co-opt CSOs to align their activities with national interests. The study offers theoretical and policy implications for understanding the evolving role of civil society in shaping political identity.
References
Abdelrahman, M. (2004). Civil Society Exposed : The Politics of NGOs in Egypt. London: I. B. Tauris.
Ashforth, B., & Mael, F. (1989). Social Identity Theory and the Organization. The Academy of Management Review, 14 (1): 20–39. https://doi.org/10.2307/258189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/258189
Brandsen, T., Trommel, W., & Verschuere, B. (2017). The State and the Reconstruction of Civil Society. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83(4), 676–693. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852315592467. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852315592467
Hulme, D., & Edwards, M. (1997). ‘NGOs, States, and Donors: An Overview,’ in D. Hulme and M. Edwards (eds) NGOs, States, and Donors: Too Close for Comfort? London: Macmillan Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25253-4
Kontinen, T., & Millstein, M. (2017). Rethinking Civil Society in Development: Scales and Situated Hegemonies. Forum for Development Studies, 44(1), 69–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08039410.2016.1264994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08039410.2016.1264994
Mati, J. (2020). Civil Society in ‘Politics’ and ‘Development’ in African Hyrbird Regimes: The Kenyan Case. International Society for Third-Sector Research, 31(1), 674–687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-020-00211-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-020-00211-y
Migdal, J. (1988). Strong Societies and Weak States in Understanding political development. New Jersey:Princeton University Press, https://doi.org/10.2307/1963229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1963229
Ochman, M. (2019). Financing Development Projects: An Approach by Civil Society Organizations. Latin American Policy, 10(1), 144–161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lamp.12157
Onuh, P. A., & Cyril Ike, C. (2021). Civil Society Organizations and electoral credibility in Nigeria. Africa Review, 13(2), 233–250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09744053.2021.1941694
Putnam, R. (1995). Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1995.0002
Salamon, L. M., & Toepler, S. (2015). Government–Nonprofit Cooperation: Anomaly or Necessity? International Society for Third-Sector Research and The Johns Hopkins University, 26, 2155–2177.
Streeten, P. (1997). Nongovernmental Organizations and Development. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 554, 193–210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716297554001012
Tusalem, R. (2007). A Boon or a Bane? The Role of Civil Societ Third- and Fourth-Wave Dem. International Political Science Review, 28(3), 361– 386. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512107077097
Verba, S., & Almond, G. (1963). The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400874569
Willis, C. (2019). Democratization and civil society development through the perspectives of Gramsci and Tocqueville in South Korea and Japan. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 5(4), 371–384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2057891119867401
