The Role of Privacy As An Ethical Guarantee in The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Public Utilities: A Comparative Analytical Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56830/IJHMPS06202505Keywords:
Ethical Guarantee, Artificial Intelligence, Public Utility Services, Right to Privacy, Ethical SafeguardsAbstract
Accelerated scientific development has imposed itself on countries with different degrees of progress between them, and artificial intelligence is one of the most prominent manifestations of this development, and artificial intelligence is generally meant to simulate machines to the mental abilities of humans, and this technology emerged in the last stage of the last century, and led to a major transformation in various areas of life. It is important that this legal framework coincides with an ethical charter that addresses the ethical risks arising from the administration's use of artificial intelligence applications. This charter includes a set of principles and guarantees aimed at reducing those risks, such as: the right to privacy and protection of personal data, transparency and integrity, justice and equality, responsibility, and other ethical principles.
The study addresses this important dimension, and sheds more light on one of the principles that represent ethical guarantees in this field, which is the guarantee of the privacy of personal data, and this dimension has aroused our interest due to the lack of legal studies that dealt with it. The study has resulted in important results and recommendations worthy of implementation to move forward towards the establishment of integrated legislation regulating the administration's use of artificial intelligence systems, and to exert more effort towards the establishment of an ethical charter that includes a set of guarantees such as the guarantee of privacy and the protection of personal data, in order to achieve the desired balance between the escalating technical innovation of those systems on the one hand and the protection of rights and freedoms on the other hand, and to ensure a safer use of these systems in general and in the field of providing public utility services in particular.
References
Abdellatif, M. M. (2021, May 24 ). responsible for artificial intelligence in public and private law, research submitted to the Conference on the Legal and Economic Aspects of Artificial Intelligence and Information Technology. p. p. 12.
Alan, E. B.-S. (March 2020). Ethics of artificial intelligence: issues and initiatives. European Parliamentary Research Service Scientific.
Al-Homsani, S. (1979). The Pillars of Human Rights: A Comparative Research in Islamic Law and Modern Laws. Egypt: Dar Al-Alam for Millions.
Al-Mujam Al-Wasit, Al-Maani Al-Jamaa Complex. (n.d.).
(April 24, 2024). Article Thirteen of the proposal attached to the report submitted by the Legislative and Legal Affairs Committee of Majlis AlShura. unpublished.
Article 1 of the proposal attached to the report submitted by the Legislative and Legal Affairs Committee of Majlis Al-Shura. (24 April 2024). Article 1 of the proposal attached to the report submitted by the Legislative and Legal Affairs Committee of Majlis Al-Shura.
(15 July 2020). Published in the Egyptian Official Gazette, Issue 28bis(E). the Egyptian Official Gazette.
Law No. 78-17 , on Information Technologies, Data Files and Individual
Liberties. (1978, January 6). Retrieved from
https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/ar/legislation/details/18963 Azzawi, D. S. (2000). Views on Democracy. p. p.81.
Bakheet, M. S. (2023). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence Applications on the Development of Public Utility Services (Smart Management as a Model). Forty-third Issue, p. p. 3405.
Boddington, P. (2017). teaches philosophy. the New College of the Humanities, London: Springer.
(16 December 1966.). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
(n.d.). Transparency and accountability in AI systems safeguarding wellbeing in the age of algorithmic decision-making. Retrieved from https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/human-dynamics, doi 10.3389/fhumd.2024. 1421273..
Commission euro penne. (8avr.2019). Lignes directrices en matière d 'éthique pour une intelligence artificial digne de confi.
Council, t. L. (April 24, 2024). Article 5 of the proposal attached to the report submitted. the Legislative and Legal Affairs Committee of the Shura Council.
(1948). Article 12 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Paris: the General Chest, B.
Dr. Fahad Saeed Al-Dhuhoori, M. A.-N. (2024, March). The Administration's Responsibility for the Uses of Artificial Intelligence on the Basis of Error. Volume 21, p. p. 308.
Draft Arab Charter for the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. (n.d.). Ministry of Communications and Information Technology in coordiwithin the project on Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance for Development. Palestine : Ministry of Communications and Information Technology in coordination with Birzeit University.
European Artificial Intelligence Board. (n.d.). the ‘Board') is established.
European Parliament. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu
Fawzi, W. (2024). Principles and Ethics of Artificial Intelligence, Al-Bayan Center for Studies and Planning.
Glaser, A.-S. C.-G. (2018). Responsabilité civile du fait du robot doué intelligence artificielle:faut-il créer une responsabilité robotique?
Glenn, R. (2003). The Right to Privacy: Rights and Liberties under the Law (America's Freedoms). ABC-CLIO. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9798216008996
Huang, C. (2023, August). An Overview of Artificial Intelligence Ethics, IEEE, Transaction, Vol, no4,9. Vol, no4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TAI.2022.3194503
Karim, A. A. (2024). The Ethical Risks of Artificial Intelligence Applications, Analytical Study. Journal of the Faculty of Education, Benha University, Egypt, , Issue 137, Issue 137, C(1) p. 341.
Mahmoud, W. R. (2022, April). Constitutional and Legal Protection of Personal Data, Comparative Study between Egyptian and French Legislation,. Volume 113(Part Two), p. p. 397.
Masaar. (n.d.). Masaar . Retrieved from Masaar : https://masaar.net/ar
McCarthy. (1989). Artificial Intelligence, Logic, and Formalizing Common Sense Philosophical Logic and Artificial Intelligence. . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2448-2_6
McCarthy. (1993). Artificial intelligence A Philosophical Introduction 1st Edition, Wiley-Blackwel.
Mengchen Dong, K. B. (2024). Responsibility gaps and self-interest bias: People attribute moral.
Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). “Right of privacy.” Merriam-Webster.com Legal Dictionary.
Miller, K. (2024, March 18). Privacy in an AI Era: How Do We Protect Our Personal Information's? human cantered artificial intelligence,. Musa, A. H. (n.d.). Moral Obligation and Legal Obligation, Nature and Scope. others, L. F. (2018). AI4 People —An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society. political encyclopedia. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://political-
encyclopedia.org/dictionary/
Rabhi, A. H. (n.d.). Limits of liability of the public utility for the uses of artificial intelligence devices? . Introduction to the Conference on Artificial Intelligence. unpublished. Facultyof Law, Universityof Sharjah, unpublished.
Ramos, G. (n.d.). Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Retrieved from unesco: https://www.unesco.org/ar/artificial-intelligence/recommendation-ethics
Saleh, D. t. (2000). The Reality of Computer Crimes in Jordanian Penal Legislation. (p. p.10). the Faculty of Sharia and Law, United Arab Emirates University.
Saudi Authority for Data and Artificial Intelligence (sdaia. (September 2023). Principles of Artificial Intelligence Ethics.
Saudi Authority for Data and Artificial Intelligence. (n.d.). the Principles of Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Retrieved from https://sdaia.gov.sa
Smart Dubai. (2021). Principles and Guidelines for the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence.
Sorour, A. F. (1978). The Right to Private Life. Journal of Law and Economics, , No. 54, No. 54, p. 47.
Taylor, J. (2020). forecast combinations for value at risk and expected short fall. 36, p. p428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2019.05.014
The Egyptian Supreme Constitutional Court. (1972). The judgment of the Egyptian Supreme Constitutional Court in the session of March 18, 1995in Case No. 23 of 16 judicial year after the constitutionality of the sixth item of Article 73 of the State Council Law promulgated by Law No. 47 .
The European Commission. (2021). The draft law.
The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). (5 September 2017). Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR)in Case No. 61496/08.
The Shura Council. (n.d.). Principle 16 of the Egyptian Charter for Responsible Artificial Intelligence.
the website of the National Portal of the Kingdom of Bahrain. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://bahrain.bh/wps/portal/ar/
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2021). The Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (November 22, 2021). Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence.
United Nations. (n.d.). United Nations. Retrieved from www.un.org
Veena, A. (2024, July 19). The ethical use of AI balances innovation and integrity. Retrieved from https://www.ultralytics.com/ar/blog/the-ethicaluse-of-ai-balances-innovation-and-integrity
