Digital Activism at the Intersection of Social Media and Political Movement

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56830/IJHMPS12202504

Keywords:

Digital Activism, Social Media, Political Movement

Abstract

Digital activism, which is defined as political engagement via internet-connected technologies and social media platforms, has radically changed the ways in which movements attract supporters and spread their political messages. This paper takes an exhaustive look at digital activism at the confluence of social media platforms like Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, and Twitter with political movement-building; it assesses both its transformative potential and major limitations. Social media affordances such as reduced cost of participation, signaling identity, and algorithmic curation act as important catalysts for movement success. However, there are very serious challenges to the integrity of digital activism that this paper will note: increasing censorship, deepfakes, coordinated inauthentic behavior attacks against us all from within the system itself expose ecosystem vulnerabilities and make it harder than ever before to tell real people apart from manipulated ones. The analysis focuses on that even though the internet is a giant leap forward for civic participation, it does not take away from the fact that closing digital divides in access and usage equity as well as ensuring government accountability are still very much part of the equation. Transformative potential does not just come with technological innovation; rather it comes with paired democratic governance frameworks, digital literacy initiatives, and human rights protections online as well as offline

References

B. Chibita, M. (2016). Digital activism in Uganda. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40949-8_4

Ba, H. L., & Şen, F. (2024). Explaining variation in national cryptocurrency regulation. Implications for the global political economy, Review of International Political Economy. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2024.2325403

Bossetta, M. (2019). The Digital Architectures of Social Media. Comparing Political Campaigning on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat in the 2016 U.S, Election. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018763307

Colon, V. (2016). Citizen Journalist to Activist. the Language Behind Black Lives Matter.

Corpus Ong, J., & Vincent A. Cabañes, J. (2018). Architects of Networked Disinformation. Behind the Scenes of Troll Accounts and Fake News Production in the Philippines.

Dey, A. (2016). A brief exploration of the effects of ICTs and social media on the gender activism in India post december 16th 2012.

Díaz-Romero, L. (2013). Enhancing Civic Engagement in the Digital Age. Global Activism, New Media and the Virtual Public Sphere.

Earl, J., Maher, T. V., & Pan, J. (2022). The digital repression of social movements, protest, and activism. A synthetic review, Science advances. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abl8198

Fouquaert, T., & Mechant, P. (n.d). Making curation algorithms apparent. a case study of 'Instawareness' as a means to heighten awareness and understanding of Instagram's algorithm, Information.

Garcia, S. (2015). Can Cyberactivism Effectuate Global Political Change?. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58809/DZXN8806

Gorwa, R., & Garton Ash, T. (2019). Democratic Transparency in the Platform Society. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/ehcy2

Herasimenka, A., & Herasimenka, A. (2016). Political participation and internet platforms. How new communication technologies help Belarusian civic activists.

Hintz, A. (2016). Restricting digital sites of dissent. commercial social media and free expression. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2016.1141695

Lou, C., Yap, C. N., Zhou, X., Lim, J. A., Koh, M. T., & Tan, A. (2024). Explicating the effects of in-versus out-group membership and collective action framing on social media activism messages. International Journal of Communication.

Meo, M. S., & Anees, A. (2025). Tech Collaboration & Digital Inclusion. Reshaping Global Trade in the Age of Climate Policy, Sustainable Futures. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100890

Rodima-Taylor, D. (2023). The cryptopolitics of digital mutuality. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.9891559.10

Cryptopolitics. Exposure, concealment, and digital media, 12, 156.

Sehgal, V., Peshin, A., Afroz, S., & Farid, H. (2021). Mutual Hyperlinking Among Misinformation Peddlers.

Terzis, G. (2016). The end of hypocrisy. Online activism and ethno-political conflicts. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24135/pjr.v22i1.15

Tran Truong, B., Lou, X., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2019). Quantifying the Vulnerabilities of the Online Public Square to Adversarial Manipulation Tactics.

Velte, A. (2016). Activist Social Media Archiving. Practices, Challenges, and Opportunities.

Wang, C. (2019). The role of social media in mobilizing social movements. a case study of the Save the arctic campaign.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-01

How to Cite

Digital Activism at the Intersection of Social Media and Political Movement. (2025). Interdisciplinary Journal of Humanities, Media, and Political Science, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.56830/IJHMPS12202504