Media Framing of International Crises: Narratives, Public Perception, and Political Responses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56830/IJHMPS06202607Keywords:
Media framing, International crises, Public perception, Political responseAbstract
International crises are mediated via narratives that shape public knowledge, coverage priorities, and the legitimacy of political actors. This paper examines how Western information shops replicate, extend, or challenge perceptions of crises, asking which frames elevate urgency and inspire intervention. Drawing on framing theory and a narrative method, it analyzes the interaction of institutional incentives, target market expectations, and media representations. The evaluation distinguishes obligation frames, which assign blame; thematic frames, which emphasize broader styles; human-hobby frames, which customize suffering; and protection and humanitarian frames. Victimization and organization narratives attract interest, considering the fact that portraying populations as passive sufferers can obscure external obligation and weaken support for powerful policy. Comparative evidence from crises in the Middle East and SubSaharan Africa shows that Middle Eastern conflicts are more often framed around hazard, destruction, and national-security concerns, whilst African crises are more often humanitarianized, lowering their function on coverage agendas. Case research on sanctions towards Iran and Russia suggests that media narratives can sell consequential financial responses over naval action. Overall, coverage shifts as crises evolve, influencing public opinion, political discourse, aid allocation, and intervention decisions. Media framing consequently operates not simply as description, but as an important mechanism connecting global activities to democratic debate and foreign policy.
References
Archetti, C. (2004). Are the media globalizing political discourse? The war on terrorism case study.
Archetti, C. (2007). A multidisciplinary understanding of news: Comparing elite press framing of 9/11 in the US, Italy, France and Pakistan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13216597.2007.9674709
Boukouvidis, T. (2018). Similarities and differences in Western media portrayals of the Greek economic crisis: A qualitative analysis of The Guardian and The New York Times' summer 2015 coverage of the Greek economic crisis.
Carver, A., & Harrie, C. (2017). Framing terrorists in Canada: A comparative analysis of two shootings.
Dan, V., Ihlen, Ø., & Raknes, K. (2022). Political public relations and strategic framing. In J. Strömbäck & S. Kiousis (Eds.), Political public relations: Concepts, principles, and applications (Chapter 7). Routledge.
Gakunju, L. (2017). Effect of media on peacebuilding in Kenya: A case of the 2007/8 PEV.
Gamreklidze, E. (2015). Sourcing and framing analysis of source messages in the coverage of armed conflicts by American and British foreign reporters.
Golliard, M. (2013). Economic sanctions: Embargo on stage. Theory and empirical evidence.
Iacob, R. (2022). Framing theory. In Blind spots in the spotlight: National Bank of Romania's answers to the financial crisis aftershocks from the perspective of central bankers, the public and the media (pp. 43–61). Springer International Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04067-2_3
Kupfer Schneider, A. (2009). International media and conflict resolution: Making the connection.
Lynn Brunken, B. (2006). Hurricane Katrina: A content analysis of media framing, attribute agenda setting, and tone of government response.
Lypka, A. (2011). Framing 10/12 and 3/11 in American and European news.
Marino, A., Pierre, C., Vollmer, M., D'Amato, G., Gianni, M., & Ruedin, D. (2023).
Narratives of crisis and their influence on attitudes, behaviour, and policies of migration and mobility: A framework.
Mosurska, A., Clark-Ginsberg, A., Ford, J., Sallu, S. M., & Davis, K. (2023). International humanitarian narratives of disasters, crises, and Indigeneity. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12576
Rodrigues, R. (2004). 9/11 and the international media: A cross-cultural analysis.
Ruth Dabbs, E. (2019). Framing effects on fear of terrorism and willingness to sacrifice civil liberties.
Sadiq, M., Croucher, S., Ma, L., & Kang, F. (2025). A sentiment analysis of the COVID-19 vaccine crisis in Nigerian online newspapers. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-03-2025-0063
Saksena, M. (2018). Framing infectious diseases: Effective policy implementation and United States public opinion. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72230-6_6
Spiridonov, V., Ćurić, M., & Novkovski, N. (2025). Exploring natural hazards: From earthquakes, floods, and beyond. In Atmospheric perspectives: Unveiling earth's environmental challenges (pp. 271–306). Springer Nature Switzerland. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-86757-6_11
Toshkov, D., Mazepus, H., & Dimitrova, A. (2018). Evidence from the EU's Eastern Neighbourhood.
Zaslavsky, K. (2019). Kill or be killed: Seeing the Middle East as a threat to the Western world.
