Choosing the Right NoSQL Database: MongoDB vs. Aerospike for Enterprise Applications

Authors

  • Mukesh Reddy Dhanagari Charles Schwab Corporation, Charles Schwab Corporation (United States) image/svg+xml Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56830/IJSIE202403

Keywords:

NoSQL advancements, , Hybrid database architectures, AI and ML integration, Real- time performance optimization, Enterprise scalability

Abstract

The paper provides an in-depth analysis of the main differences between MongoDB and Aerospike as representatives of NoSQL database solutions in enterprise applications, focusing on their architectural differences, performance, and adaptability to various workloads. As a document-oriented database, MongoDB has schema flexibility, rich querying, good integration with analytics pipelines, and is well-suited to content management, e-commerce, and customer data platform use cases. Aerospike is a highperformance key-value store focusing on ultra-low latency, deterministic scalability, and throughput, with real-time analytics, financial services, advertising technology, and IoT among the use cases it excels at. The comparison analyzes data models, scaling mechanisms, consistency models, and benchmark performances, showing a comparison where MongoDB excels in complex queries and schema evolution flexibility, compared to Aerospike excelling with predictable sub-millisecond responses and high throughput operations functions. Applications in the industry and the purpose demonstrate the capabilities of each of these systems with MongoDB and its flexibility, and Aerospike and its stability in high-stakes tasks. Future work is then discussed in the form of NoSQL advances that include enhancements to distributed transactions, storage, predictive auto scaling, and implementing adequate security functions. The paper is also able to spot the prospects in hybrid constructions based on the use of both systems, further integration with AI, ML, and big data platforms, and the prospects of performance optimization, geodistributional fault tolerance, and energy-efficient systems. Findings conclude that data requirements dictate the use of databases: when flexibility, analytics binding, and schema flexibility are oriented towards MongoDB, and when latency, probing inner transactions, and Aerospike are better. This comparison can give enterprise architects and decisionmakers practical data in helping enterprises align database capabilities with operational and strategic goals.

References

[1] Anusha, K., Rajesh, N., Kavitha, M., & Ravinder, N. (2021, April). Comparative

Study of MongoDB vs Cassandra in big data analytics. In 2021 5th International Conference on Computing Methodologies and Communication (ICCMC) (pp. 18311835). IEEE.

[2] Baumann, A., Haupt, J., Gebert, F., & Lessmann, S. (2019). The price of privacy: An evaluation of the economic value of collecting clickstream data. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 61(4), 413-431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-018-0528-2

[3] Brumen, B., & Volavc, F. (2020). Comparison of Open Source NoSQL Solutions Using Utility Function. In Information Modelling and Knowledge Bases XXXI (pp. 116-140). IOS Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA200011

[4] Butterstein, D., Martin, D., Stolze, K., Beier, F., Zhong, J., & Wang, L. (2020). Replication at the speed of change: a fast, scalable replication solution for near real-time HTAP processing. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 13(12), 32453257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14778/3415478.3415548

[5] Cai, S., Gallina, B., Nyström, D., & Seceleanu, C. (2019). Data aggregation processes: a survey, a taxonomy, and design guidelines. Computing, 101(10), 13971429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-018-0679-5

[6] Carrara, G. R., Burle, L. M., Medeiros, D. S., de Albuquerque, C. V. N., & Mattos, D. M. (2020). Consistency, availability, and partition tolerance in blockchain: a survey on the consensus mechanism over peer-to-peer networking. Annals of Telecommunications, 75(3), 163-174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12243-020-00751-w

[7] Chavan, A. (2021). Exploring event-driven architecture in microservices: Patterns, pitfalls, and best practices. International Journal of Software and Research Analysis. https://ijsra.net/content/exploring-event-driven-architecturemicroservices-patterns-pitfalls-and-best-practices

[8] Chavan, A. (2023). Managing scalability and cost in microservices architecture: Balancing infinite scalability with financial constraints. Journal of Artificial Intelligence & Cloud Computing, 2, E264. http://doi.org/10.47363/JAICC/2023(2)E264 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47363/JAICC/2023(2)E264

[9] Gessert, F., Wingerath, W., & Ritter, N. (2020). Caching in Research and Industry. In Fast and Scalable Cloud Data Management (pp. 85-130). Cham: Springer International Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43506-6_5

[10] Giamas, A. (2022). Mastering MongoDB 6. x: Expert techniques to run high-volume and fault-tolerant database solutions using MongoDB 6. x. Packt Publishing Ltd.

[11] Győrödi, C. A., Dumşe-Burescu, D. V., Zmaranda, D. R., & Győrödi, R. Ş. (2022). A comparative study of MongoDB and document-based MySQL for big data application data management. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 6(2), 49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc6020049

[12] Jericevich, I., Sing, D., & Gebbie, T. (2022). CoinTossX: An open-source lowlatency high-throughput matching engine. SoftwareX, 19, 101136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2022.101136

[13] Karwa, K. (2023). AI-powered career coaching: Evaluating feedback tools for design students. Indian Journal of Economics & Business. https://www.ashwinanokha.com/ijeb-v22-4-2023.php

[14] Kaul, D. (2019). Optimizing resource allocation in multi-cloud environments with artificial intelligence: Balancing cost, performance, and security. JICET, 4, 1-25.

[15] Kläbe, S., Hagedorn, S., & Sattler, K. U. (2023). Exploration of Approaches for InDatabase ML. In EDBT (Vol. 23, pp. 311-323).

[16] Kolb, J., AbdelBaky, M., Katz, R. H., & Culler, D. E. (2020). Core concepts, challenges, and future directions in blockchain: A centralized tutorial. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 53(1), 1-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3366370

[17] Konneru, N. M. K. (2021). Integrating security into CI/CD pipelines: A DevSecOps approach with SAST, DAST, and SCA tools. International Journal of Science and Research Archive. Retrieved from https://ijsra.net/content/role-notificationscheduling-improving-patient

[18] Kumar, A. (2019). The convergence of predictive analytics in driving business intelligence and enhancing DevOps efficiency. International Journal of Computational Engineering and Management, 6(6), 118-142. Retrieved from https://ijcem.in/wp-content/uploads/THE-CONVERGENCE-OF-PREDICTIVEANALYTICS-IN-DRIVING-BUSINESS-INTELLIGENCE-AND-ENHANCINGDEVOPS-EFFICIENCY.pdf

[19] Langner, D., Gupta, A., Miller, R., & Agrawal, A. K. (2022). Design and implementation of a disk-shaped radial rotating detonation engine with integrated aerospike. In AIAA SciTech 2022 Forum (p. 0642). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2022-0642

[20] Lu, J., & Holubová, I. (2019). Multi-model databases: a new journey to handle the variety of data. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 52(3), 1-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3323214

[21] Malla, S., & Christensen, K. (2019). A survey on power management techniques for oversubscription of multi-tenant data centers. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 52(1), 1-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3291049

[22] Matalgah, M. M., & Alqodah, M. A. (2023). Real-Time Ground-Based Flight Data and Cockpit Voice Recorder: Implementation Scenarios and Feasibility Analysis. John Wiley & Sons. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119984894

[23] Miao, H., Jeon, M., Pekhimenko, G., McKinley, K. S., & Lin, F. X. (2019, April). Streambox-hbm: Stream analytics on high bandwidth hybrid memory. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (pp. 167-181). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3297858.3304031

[24] Nyati, S. (2018). Revolutionizing LTL carrier operations: A comprehensive analysis of an algorithm-driven pickup and delivery dispatching solution. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 7(2), 1659-1666. Retrieved from https://www.ijsr.net/getabstract.php?paperid=SR24203183637 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21275/SR24203183637

[25] Oladeji, O. (2023). Data-Driven Sustainability: Advancing Electric Vehicle Adoption and Carbon Accounting Using Artificial Intelligence and Geospatial Analytics. Stanford University.

[26] Raju, R. K. (2017). Dynamic memory inference network for natural language inference. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 6(2). https://www.ijsr.net/archive/v6i2/SR24926091431.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.21275/SR24926091431

[27] Sardana, J. (2022). The role of notification scheduling in improving patient outcomes. International Journal of Science and Research Archive. Retrieved from https://ijsra.net/content/role-notification-scheduling-improving-patient

[28] Shen, W. (2022). A performance comparison of NoSQL and SQL databases for different scales of ecommerce systems. Diss. Auckland University of Technology.

[29] Shepard, M. (2022). There are no facts: attentive algorithms, extractive data practices, and the quantification of everyday life. MIT press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/14130.001.0001

[30] Singh, V. (2023). Large language models in visual question answering: Leveraging LLMs to interpret complex questions and generate accurate answers based on visual input. International Journal of Advanced Engineering and Technology

(IJAET), 5(S2). https://romanpub.com/resources/Vol%205%20%2C%20No%20S2%20-%2012.pdf

[31] Singh, V., Doshi, V., Dave, M., Desai, A., Agrawal, S., Shah, J., & Kanani, P.

(2020). Answering Questions in Natural Language About Images Using Deep

Learning. In Futuristic Trends in Networks and Computing Technologies: Second International Conference, FTNCT 2019, Chandigarh, India, November 22–23, 2019, Revised Selected Papers 2 (pp. 358-370). Springer Singapore. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-15-4451-4_28

[32] Sivanathan, A. (2020). IoT behavioral monitoring via network traffic analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.10632.

[33] Thapa, A. B. (2022). Optimizing MongoDB performance with indexing: practices of indexing in MongoDB.

[34] Vergadia, P. (2022). Visualizing Google Cloud: 101 Illustrated References for Cloud Engineers and Architects. John Wiley & Sons.

[35] Win, E. P. S. (2023). LEARNING IN HORIZONTAL SCALING MONGODB DATA

SHARDING ON WINDOWS. i-manager's Journal on Software Engineering, 17(3).

[36] Zhang, J., Chen, T., Zhong, S., Wang, J., Zhang, W., Zuo, X., ... & Hanzo, L. (2019).

Aeronautical $ Ad~ Hoc $ networking for the Internet-above-the-clouds.

Proceedings of the IEEE, 107(5), 868-911.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-06

Issue

Section

Articles