AI-Driven Cybersecurity Risk Management in Organizations: Threat Intelligence, Automation, and Resilience
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56830/WRBA03202604Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity, Risk Management, Threat Intelligence, AutomationAbstract
With the rise of cyber threats and the need for organizations to adequately protect their operations, there is a growing need to integrate AI capabilities into cybersecurity risk management to face the increased threat landscape. AI-driven risk management offers benefits such as threat intelligence, helping organizations quantify and model risks proactively and more efficiently while ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements across multiple jurisdictions. Companies with end-to-end AIdriven, automated cybersecurity operations are likely to see a steady ROI in the form of business continuity (lack of operational disruptions), income security (less revenue loss due to breaches), and better data protection (lower levels of reported incidents). Cybersecurity risk management with AI capabilities could continue to be applied to address market shortages and high employee turnover rates as the technology continues to evolve and grow. Taking advantage of AI’s capabilities, combined with those of other technologies, allows organizations to learn to better identify and characterize a real-time cyber threat landscape that responds to the behavior of their unique attack surface and the benefits of AI-driven cybersecurity risk management. To stay on top of cybersecurity, all security must be handled at the same level. Future technologies are prepared to respond to every stage of cybersecurity threats. New technologies in cybersecurity risk management boost operational effectiveness by allowing professionals to identify and eliminate the proper dangers. Organizations can always prevent literal catastrophes by designing and implementing future technologies proactively. As security standards change from area to area, they become more complex and challenging to meet for large corporations. Organizations will invest more money in technology in the future to help with regulatory compliance. To stay ahead of competitors and meet customer needs, one's operations can be easily audited, certified, and certified.
References
Agbede, O. M. (2023). Incident handling and response process in security operations.
Ainslie, S., Thompson, D., Maynard, S., & Ahmad, A. (2023). Cyber-threat intelligence for security decision-making: A review and research agenda for practice. Computers & Security. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2023.103352
Aljahdali, A. O., & Alsulami, R. (2025). Streamlining threat response and automating critical use cases with security orchestration, automation and response (SOAR). Journal of Digital Security and Forensics, 2(1), 36-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29121/digisecforensics.v2.i1.2025.45
Bernardez Molina, S., Nespoli, P., & Gómez Mármol, F. (2023). Tackling Cyberattacks through AIbased Reactive Systems. A Holistic Review and Future Vision.
Dhir, N., Hoeltgebaum, H., Adams, N., Briers, M., Burke, A., & Jones, P. (2021). Prospective Artificial Intelligence Approaches for Active Cyber Defence.
Dotan, R., Blili-Hamelin, B., Madhavan, R., Matthews, J., & Scarpino, J. (2024). Evolving AI Risk Management: A Maturity Model based on the NIST AI Risk Management Framework.
Elizabeth Cannon, J. (2019). Strategies for Improving Data Protection to Reduce Data Loss from Cyberattacks.
Faksova, K., Walsh, D., Jiang, Y., Griffin, J., Phillips, A., Gentile, A., et al. (2024). COVID-19 vaccines and adverse events of special interest: A multinational Global Vaccine Data Network (GVDN) cohort study of 99 million vaccinated individuals. Vaccine, 42(9), 2200-2211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.01.100
H. Sarker, I., Janicke, H., Mohammad, N., Watters, P., & Nepal, S. (2023). AI Potentiality and Awareness: A Position Paper from the Perspective of Human-AI Teaming in Cybersecurity. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50887-5_14
Huang, K., & Pearlson, K. (2019). For What Technology Can’t Fix: Building a Model of Organizational Cybersecurity Culture. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2019.769
Islam, C., Ali Babar, M., & Nepal, S. (2020). A Multi-Vocal Review of Security Orchestration. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3305268
Jani, M. Y., Betheja, M. R., Chaudhari, U., & Sarkar, B. (2023). Effect of future price increase for products with expiry dates and price-sensitive demand under different payment policies. Mathematics. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math11020263
K L Ko, R. (2020). Cyber Autonomy: Automating the Hacker- Self-healing, self-adaptive, automatic cyber defense systems and their impact to the industry. society and national security.
Kesa, D. M. (2023). Ensuring resilience: Integrating IT disaster recovery planning and business continuity for sustainable information technology operations. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews.
Labadie, C., & Legner, C. (2023). Building data management capabilities to address data protection regulations: Learnings from EU-GDPR. Journal of Information Technology. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02683962221141456
Onifade, A. Y., Ogeawuchi, J. C., & Abayomi, A. A. (2023). A Conceptual Framework for Cost Optimization in IT Infrastructure Using Resource Monitoring Tool. DOI: https://doi. org/10.54660/. IJFMR, 1-288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54660/.IJFMR.2023.4.1.288-298
Pery, A., Rafiei, M., Simon, M., & M. P. van der Aalst, W. (2021). Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence and Process Mining. Challenges and Opportunities. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98581-3_29
Polemi, N., Praça, I., Kioskli, K., & Bécue, A. (2024). Challenges and efforts in managing AI trustworthiness risks: a state of knowledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2024.1381163
Radanliev, P., De Roure, D., Maple, C., & Ani, U. (2022). Super-forecasting the ‘technological singularity’ risks from artificial intelligence. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-919939/v1
Rahman, M. M., Pokharel, B. P., Sayeed, S. A., Bhowmik, S. K., Kshetri, N., & Eashrak, N. (2024).
riskAIchain: AI-driven IT infrastructure—Blockchain-backed approach for enhanced risk management. Risks, 12(12), 206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/risks12120206
Rathore, P., & Kolhe, K. (2024). Integrating Automation and Orchestration in Security Incident Handling: A Review of SOAR Frameworks and Platforms. In The Unified International Conference on Emerging Technologies in Cyber-Physical Systems and Industrial AI , (pp. 529551). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-95963-9_38
Sangwa, S., & Mutabazi, P. (2025). AI-Powered reforms to end academic publishing delays: A datadriven framework for faster, fairer peer review. Open Journal of AI, Ethics & Society, (ISSN: 3105-3076), 1(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.65655/qnaeev03
Schröder, J., & Breier, J. (2024). RMF: A Risk Measurement Framework for Machine Learning Models. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3664476.3670867
Thummala, V. R., & Bindewari, S. (2024). Optimizing cybersecurity practices through compliance and risk assessment. International Journal of Research Radicals in Multidisciplinary Fields, ISSN, 910-930.
Turner Pearson, D. (2020). An exploration of the overlap between open source threat intelligence and active internet background radiation.
Ziras, G., Farao, A., Zarras, A., & Xenakis, C. (2025). From vulnerability to resilience: Adversarial training and real-time detection for AI security. Array. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.array.2025.100546
