How Does Human Resources Perception Affect Organizational Ambidexterity?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56830/WRBAJ03202205

Keywords:

Human Resources Perception, Organizational Ambidexterity

Abstract

This study examines the impact of perception on work behavior. Individual differences are important in studying organizational behavior and management for  a very important reason. Individual differences have a direct effect on behavior, every person is unique because of his perception, people with different perceptions have different characteristics, needs, and how they perceive the world and other individuals and interact differently with bosses, co-workers, subordinates and customers. Individual perceptions shape organizational behavior and consequentlyindividual and organizational success for example, individual differences help examine why some people embrace exchange and others are fearful of it. Or why
some employees will be productive only if they are closely supervised, while others will be productive only if they are not .Or why some workers learn new tasks more
effectively than others A helpful way to think about the importance of individual differences in influencing work behavior is through the use of the AttractionSelection-Attrition (ASA) framework. Different people are attracted to different careers and organizations as a function of their own abilities, interests and
personalities. Similarly, organization select employees on the basis of the needs the organization has.

 Needs refers to not only to skills and abilities, but also to individual attributes such as values, and personality. Not all attraction decisions and selection decisions work out, however, Attrition occurs when individuals discover they do not like being part of the organizations and selects to resign or when the organization determines an individual isn’t succession and select to terminate

References

Amir Abou Elnaga. (2012). The Impact of Perception on Work Behavior. Kuwait Chapter of Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 2(2).

Blagoeva, R. R., Mom, T. J. M., Jansen, J. J. P., & George, G. (2020). ProblemSolving or Self-Enhancement? A Power Perspective on How CEOs Affect R&D Search in the Face of Inconsistent Feedback. Https://Doi.Org/10.5465/Amj.2017.0999, 63(2), 332–355. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2017.0999

Cemal Zehir, Esin Can, & Tugba Karaboga. (2015). Linking Entrepreneurial Orientation to Firm performance: the Role of Differentiation Strategy and Innovation Performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 210, 358–367.

Ferris, G. R., Perrewé, P. L., Ranft, A. L., Zinko, R., Stoner, J. S., Brouer, R. L., & Laird, M. D. (2007). Human Resources Reputation and Effectiveness. Human

Resource Management Review, 17(2), 117–130.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HRMR.2007.03.003

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with

Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312

Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012). An Assessment of the Use of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling in Marketing Research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40, 414–433.

Jiang, K., Takeuchi, R., & Lepak, D. P. (2013). Where do we go from here? New perspectives on the black box in strategic human resource management research.

Journal of Management Studies, 50(8), 1448–1480. https://doi.org/10.1111/JOMS.12057

Khan, S. J., & Mir, A. A. (2019). Ambidextrous Culture, Contextual Ambidexterity and New Product Innovations: The Role of Organizational Slack and Environmental Factors. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(4), 652–663. https://doi.org/10.1002/BSE.2287

Kuvaas, B. (2008). An Exploration of How the Employee–Organization Relationship Affects the Linkage Between Perception of Developmental Human Resource Practices and Employee Outcomes*. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-6486.2007.00710.X

López-Gamero, M. D., Pereira-Moliner, J., Molina-Azorín, J. F., Tarí, J. J., & Pertusa-Ortega, E. M. (2020). Human Resource Management as an Internal Antecedent of Environmental Management: a joint Analysis with Competitive Consequences in the Hotel Industry. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2020.1841216

Mercedes Úbeda-García, Enrique Claver-Cortés, Bartolomé Marco-Lajara, Patrocinio Zaragoza-Sáez, & Francisco García-Lillo. (2017). High Performance Work system and Performance: Opening the Black Box through the Organizational Ambidexterity and Human Resource Flexibility. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.045

Owen Boukamel. (2017). Evolution of Organizational Ambidexterity in the Public Sector and Current Challenges of Innovation Capabilities. Innovation Journal, 22(2).

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319481543_Evolution_of_organizationa l_ambidexterity_in_the_public_sector_and_current_challenges_of_innovation_ca pabilities

Rama Devi, V., & Lakshmi Narayanamma, P. (2014). An Empirical Study on

Demographic Correlates of Emotional Intelligence of Engineering Students.

Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 7(12), 33. https://doi.org/10.17010//2014/V7I12/59290

Solís-Molina, M., Hernández-Espallardo, M., & Rodríguez-Orejuela, A. (2018). Performance Implications of Organizational Ambidexterity Versus Specialization in Exploitation or exploration: The Role of Absorptive Capacity. Journal of Business Research, 91, 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2018.06.001 Wan, X., Cenamor, J., Parker, G., & van Alstyne, M. (2017). Unraveling platform strategies: A review from an organizational ambidexterity perspective. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU9050734

Downloads

Published

2026-02-03 — Updated on 2026-02-05

Versions

Issue

Section

Articles